Anyone seeking to change an organization has known the pitfalls of trying to control behavior and motivation. Setting goals and expectations is not so hard. One-off wins tied to an event or a compelling speech can move the needle. But execution over the long-term .. including any lasting, sustainable change in thinking .. is another matter.
Ask Lou Gerstner, the man who moved IBM from hardware to services in the 1990’s, who said:
Culture is not just one aspect of the game, it IS the game.
I’ve always seen this as a fundamental breakthrough, a wake-up call for change the modern organization. Yet leaders will routinely, if not obsessively, plod through short-term ideas for long-term results, without ever seeing the fallacy. What’s missing is an understanding of how people in groups behave, and the implications that complexity has on an organization.
I won’t try to unpack all that here. Frankly, it’s enough to fill a book (or two), and the subject of some in-depth posts. But for the sake of discussion, let’s establish a premise: people in organizations are driven more by a need for belonging and conformity with group aspirations, and less by draconian measures to direct, incentivize or otherwise control it’s members. In this light, culture can be defined (if loosely) as a set of groundrules for survival, based on what has worked in the past. New leaders and programs come and go. But the memory of groups runs long and deep.
Try changing the minds of an organization on how things work. Ask Lou Gerstner.
For our #orgdna chat on MON 9/21/15 from 9:30 to 11:00pm ET, let’s tee up the conversation like this:
- Q1. If we can’t control behavior or results, what CAN we influence? Does environment play a key role?
- Q2. Why do organic ways of thinking (forests, ecosystems, viruses) provide rich metaphors for understanding people in groups, and org culture in general?
- Q3. What can leaders try to do in the near-term to impact the long-term?
- Q4. Can a culture be changed?
The #cdna community of thinkers became the #orgdna community last month, to better describe and focus our dialog. I think we’re off to a great start. Evidence? When one chat among a few of us creates enough ideas for 2-3 more chats, imagine what can happen if we keep going, learning as we go, even as we expand and diversify our group?
Please join us. The conversation gets more lively with more ideas in play. And lord knows we enjoy a lively conversation.
As always, thanks for stopping in.
Chris (aka @sourcepov)