When we talk about change it’s often in abstract terms. But painting in broad strokes can work against us.
We may forge blindly ahead, embracing soothing generalities that hide (for a time) the challenges and hard work that lie on the path. Or, conversely, we may falter out of the gate, overwhelmed by the complexities both real and imagined, soon abandonning the work to braver souls with more time, money and resources.
In our urgency to divine the inner secrets of change, our thinking tends to the extremes. We land in places that are either too simplistic or too complex.
Is there no middle ground? How can we hope to influence change?
I believe the journey for achieving lasting change requires an honest and objective review of our potential (as both individuals and groups) to be effective change agents. I’m also increasingly convinced we should adopt a “walk before you run” model.
We all have unique talents and perspectives. We wouldn’t be talking about change so vigorously without some sort of inner energy that fuels our aspirations to achieve better things. In the diagram I’ve shown several factors that I think are worth considering as we explore this topic. How can we better define these factors, to reduce getting lost in abstract, conceptual debates? Reflect on:
- Inner Circle. Friends, family, and colleagues. Truly our core base of support, but not a group that can scale.
- Local Impact. Those we can see, get to know, and influence directly.
- Global Impact. Those we can’t see and won’t get to know .. a group which can prove daunting to influence.
- Reach. The degree (or scale) to which we can exercise influence, considerably enhanced by social media.
As we come together for #cdna chat on MON FEB 16 at 9pm ET, using #reach and #socialchange hashtags, let’s take apart the discussion of “reach” as a factor in social and organizational change. Our answers may help us understand whether we’re serving to empower or to contrain our chances for driving change. Here are several questions to consider:
- Q1. As an individual, what determines our personal influence and reach?
- Q2. As a member of a group or community, what factors extend our #influence and what factors hurt us?
- Q3. What are the unique qualifications for leaders in this space? #influence #leadership
- Q4. What factors might serve as a ‘tipping point’ for broader or global change adoption?
- Q5. What concrete steps should we embrace early on to expand (or optimize) our ability to reach others?
Props to Scott Smith (aka @d_scott) for his guest post and moderation last month on “Spheres of Influence” .. one of his ideas (and Q’s!) spawned today’s line of thinking.
The #cdna community meets every 3rd MONDAY of the month to talk about the possibilities of change. Please join us for the conversation. We are actively seeking guest topic framers and guest moderators. Let me know if you have interest.
See you online!
Chris (aka @sourcepov)
February 16th, 2015 at 6:54 pm
Hi Chris,
Not sure I can make it for tonight’s chat but did want to contribute this from Amy Sample Ward http://amysampleward.org/2011/07/29/community-engagement-and-social-media-for-public-media/
Her Community – Network – Crowd divisions are always in the back of my mind when I think of engagement.. and of course the driver of engagement is so often a request/hope for change.
LikeLike
February 17th, 2015 at 11:58 am
Thanks Jamie, I enjoyed Amy’s post, and definitely saw some related thinking. Useful to track different degrees of engagement and reach, including the potential (and need) to expand via others in your network.
Something we should continue to investigate, I’m thinking ..
Sorry we missed you, but some great conversation ..
Next month? 3rd Monday will be 3/16 .. !
LikeLike
February 17th, 2015 at 12:01 pm
Here’s our transcript. Was great to see Bruce W back with us again, it had been awhile .. !!
Click to access cdna-2015-02-16-change-horizon.pdf
LikeLike
February 25th, 2015 at 1:06 am
[…] Q3. Understanding Scale. We talked about transition from local to global. What are the first steps? (note: I posted recently on scale and reach in more depth over at collaborationdna.com) […]
LikeLike