While the search for understanding can be traced back to the ancient greeks, the modern take on sense making has a history of it’s own.
Space will not allow for a full accounting, but I see four primary vectors to help us track its modern evolution, unwinding both the practice and promise of sense making in modern terms. Consider:
- Dervin (1983, 1992, 1996), and Russell, et al (1993, 2009) – on the human-computer interface, with the earliest explorations on the psychology of recognition and understanding.
- Klein, et al (2006) – studying frame-to-data, and data-to-frame matching as a means to test patterns observed, advancing the earlier work of Cohen, et al (1996) and Piaget (1972,1977).
- Weick (1979, 1988, 1993) – exploring organizational implications, with 7 discrete properties in the sense making process in groups or teams; without delving into them in detail, they are:
- Identification – the role/sense of self, as it relates to the observed
- Retrospection – looking back, considering the function of time
- Narrative, discourse, and feedback – developing context and understanding via story, often through real-time dialog
- Cues – using familiar points of reference
- Plausability – establishing viability of scenarios
- Snowden, et al. (2003, 2007) – with the “Cynefin” framework, introduced complex and chaotic scenarios, in contrast with the simple, the merely complicated, and the hopelessly disordered; with this more robust landscape, real world situations were more accessible, or at least visible.
How have these understandings evolved? Has sense making come of age?
This, of course, will launch a good discussion, if not a healthy debate. In our #orgdna chat MON 2/20/17 at 9:00pm ET, let’s explore this question with the following frame:
- Q1. HCI as Foundation. Was the early research important to what came after?
- Q2. Klein and Pattern Matching. How influential have patterns become re: sense making & complexity? Are we returning to foundations?
- Q3. Weick on Narrative. Has story consumed our dialog in the modern framing of sense making? For better or worse?
- Q4. Snowden & Complexity. How has Cynefin changed the sense making dialog?
- Q5. Futures. What is the path to practical application for sense making?
Our back story? The #orgdna chat community has been meeting since late 2012 on topics from leadership to learning, most often focused on the social dynamic.
To what end? Making sense of it all, of course. This topic is right up our alley.
Our conversations are typically lively. Just add #orgdna to your tweets at the appointed hour. We recommend a streaming app like TweetDeck. After the conversation, we’ll share a PDF transcript. And there’s likely to be a follow-up chat on a related thread. We do this every 3rd Monday, 9pET/6pPT.
Props to group member Christy Petit, who helped me shape this conversation.
Intrigued? I certainly am. The rest is up to the group. Hope to see you online Monday night.
Chris (aka @sourcepov, now on Medium)
February 21st, 2017 at 4:57 am
You can read the transcript of the conversation during this chat here: https://collaborationdna.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/orgdna_2017_02_20_a_time_for_sense_making.pdf