We’re kicking off our #orgdna conversation for 2017. For me, there’s no place better to start than a focus on the top questions facing orgs and their leaders. For that, there’s no better thought leader to tap than the purveyor of the better question himself, Peter Block.
In late 2012, on the heels of getting my first book out, I read both of Block’s successful primers: The Answer to How, is Yes (2002) and Community: The Structure of Belonging (2009).
Together they create an excellent structure for online conversation.
Block introduces key elements of collaborative dialog, and methods to frame social change, in general. We conducted a Peter Block book disussion at our #k12 #ecosys chat in April 2013. On reviewing it, I found the frame excellent for our next #orgdna. Let’s reuse the basic structure, with focus on the first book. Here’s an excerpt of the 2013 #ecosys frame:
Block’s ideas are 100% congruent with what I’ve seen in a variety of social Twitter-based communities. Careful question framing changes our ability to recognize new possibilities. Better questions lead us to a dialog on what matters most.
I’ve updated the #ecosys questions just a bit for #orgdna, focused more on the modern organization (noting that public schools remain “in scope”):
- Q1. Block argues “How?” bypasses questions of intention. Agree? Why?
- Q2. The right questions, Block says, are those that get us to focus on what matters. What are some examples?
- Q3. Flexible Structures. What are source/means for adaptive behavior?
- Q4. Learning Organizations. Inspired by Senge, how does this happen in +2017?
- Q5. Updated Guidance. Much has happened in OD since 2002. What would Block and others add to this dialog?
Food for thought, without a doubt. And we’ll use our takeaways to fuel follow-on frames.
Please join us on Twitter. The discussion will be MON 1/16/17, 9pm EST. We’ve been going about 90 minutes, as we work to accommodate multiple timezones and west coasters. Simply add #orgdna to your tweets. We recommend a streaming tool like TweetDeck, to follow the conversation.
There will be more book-based #orgdna discussions in 2017. Besides, Block, we should look at Margaret Wheatley again, and most certainly others. Please weigh in on a proposed sequence. The only requirement is to keep the discussions practical and accessible. It’s okay to tap theories, as long as we don’t get stuck there.
Hope you’re excited for the new year with #orgdna. Let the conversations and deep learning resume.
Chris (aka @sourcepov)
January 17th, 2017 at 7:07 am
You can read the transcript of the conversation during this chat here: https://collaborationdna.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/orgdna_2017_01_16_better_questions_for_orgs_2017.pdf